Unity               Know Christ                 Creed               About Creed             Creationist                Apostolic Succession                Holy Sacrements             Classes

Copyright EMMI IAoC Ministry.
Home              Required Reading               Weddings              About Us              Community             Links              Prayer Request              Calendar              Terms              Privacy
Theology
Apostolic Succession

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Episcopal consecration by one or more other bishops

Apostolic succession is the method whereby the ministry of the Christian Church is held to be derived from the apostles by a continuous succession, which has usually
been associated with a claim that the succession is through a series of bishops. This series was seen originally as that of the bishops of a particular see founded by one
or more of the apostles, but it is generally understood today as meaning a series of bishops, regardless of see, each consecrated by other bishops themselves
consecrated similarly in a succession going back to the apostles. Christians of the Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Old Catholic, Anglican, Moravian, and Scandinavian
Lutheran traditions maintain that “a bishop cannot have regular or valid orders unless he has been consecrated in this apostolic succession.”

Apostolic succession “may also be understood as continuity in doctrinal teaching from the time of the apostles to the present.” For example, the British Methodist
Conference locates the “true continuity” with the Church of past ages in “the continuity of Christian experience, the fellowship in the gift of the one Spirit; in the
continuity in the allegiance to one Lord, the continued proclamation of the message; the continued acceptance of the mission;…”

Those who hold for the importance of apostolic succession via episcopal laying on of hands appeal to the New Testament, which, they say, implies a personal apostolic
succession. They appeal as well to other documents of the early Church, especially the Epistle of Clement. In this context, Clement explicitly states that the apostles
appointed bishops as successors and directed that these bishops should, in turn, appoint their own successors; given this, such leaders of the Church were not to be
removed without cause and not in this way. Further, proponents of the necessity of the personal apostolic succession of bishops within the Church point to the
universal practice of the undivided early Church (up to AD 431), before being divided into the Church of the East, Oriental Orthodoxy, the Eastern Orthodox Church
and the Catholic Church. Some Protestants deny the need for this type of continuity and the historical claims involved have been severely questioned; Eric Jay
comments that the account given of the emergence of the episcopate in chapter III of Lumen Gentium “is very sketchy, and many ambiguities in the early history of the
Christian ministry are passed over”

IAoC Apostolic succession is to be understood as continuity in doctrinal teaching from the time of the apostles to the present via Mary of Magdala, James the Just,
Thomas the Apostle, Simon-Peter, John the Evangelist, until 1987 it continues via
Universal Society of New Syncretism (SUNS) that became today the Research, Theology
and Teaching Ministry.

The earliest followers of Jesus composed an apocalyptic Jewish sect, which historians refer to as Jewish Christianity. The Apostles dispersed from Jerusalem, founding
the Apostolic Sees, presumably following the Great Commission’s decree to spread the teachings of Jesus to “all nations”, with great success spreading the religion to
Gentiles. Peter, Paul, and James the Just were the most notable of early Christian leaders. Though Paul’s influence on Christian thinking is said to be more significant than
any other New Testament author, the relationship of Paul of Tarsus and Judaism is still disputed today. Rather than having a sudden split, early Christianity gradually grew
apart from Judaism as a predominantly Gentile religion. Christian restorationists propose that the 1st century Apostolic Age represents a purer form of Christianity that
should be adopted in the church as it exists today.

Jewish Christians

James the Just, whose judgment was adopted in the Apostolic Decree of Acts 15:19-29, “…we should write to them (Gentiles) to abstain only from things polluted by idols
and from fornication and from whatever has been strangled and from blood…” (NRSV). Jewish Christians were among the earliest followers of Jesus and an important part
of Judean society during the mid to late 1st century. This movement was centered around Jerusalem and led by James the Just. They held faithfully to the Torah (perhaps
also Jewish law which was being formalized at the same time), including acceptance of Gentile converts based on a version of the Noachide laws (Acts 15 and Acts 21).

In Christian circles, “Nazarene” later came to be used as a label for those faithful to Jewish law, in particular for a certain sect. These Jewish Christians, originally the
central group in Christianity, were not at first declared to be unorthodox but were later excluded and denounced. Some Jewish Christian groups, such as the Ebionites,
were considered to have unorthodox beliefs, particularly in relation to their views of Christ and Gentile converts. The Nazarenes, holding to orthodoxy except in their
adherence to Jewish law, were not deemed heretical until the dominance of orthodoxy in the 4th century. The Ebionites may have been a splinter group of Nazarenes,
with disagreements over Christology and leadership. After the condemnation of the Nazarenes, “Ebionite” was often used as a general pejorative for all related “heresies”.
Jewish Christians constituted a separate community from the Pauline Christians but maintained a similar faith, differing only in practice.

There was a post-Nicene “double rejection” of the Jewish Christians by both Gentile Christianity and Rabbinic Judaism. It is believed that there was no direct
confrontation or persecution between Gentile and Judaic Christianity. However, by this time the practice of Judeo-Christianity was diluted both by internal schisms and
external pressures. Gentile Christianity remained the sole strand of orthodoxy and imposed itself on the previously Jewish Christian sanctuaries, taking full control of
those houses of worship by the end of the 5th century.

The Nasrani or Syrian Malabar Nasrani community in Kerala, India, is conscious of their Jewish origins. However, they have lost many of their Jewish traditions because of
western influences. The Nasrani are also known as Syrian Christians or St. Thomas Christians. This is because they follow the traditions of Syriac Christianity and are
descendants of the early converts by Thomas the Apostle. Today, they belong to various denominations of Christianity, but they have kept their unique identity within each
of these denominations.

Christian groups and congregations first organized themselves loosely. In Paul’s time, although certain decisions by Elders and Apostles were binding, as in the Council
of Jerusalem, there were no precisely delineated functions yet for bishops, elders, and deacons. A Church hierarchy, however, seems to have developed by the late 1st
century and early 2nd century. These structures were certainly formalized well before the end of the Early Christian period, which concluded with the legalization of
Christianity by Constantine’s Edict of Milan in 313 and the holding of the First Council of Nicaea in 325 when the title of Metropolitan bishop first appears.

Fundamentalists' says  that apostolic succession is NOT Biblical